‘Don’t know’ – Highways Agency on A14

The most common answer I got to my questions at yesterday’s A14 consultation was ‘don’t know’, and really it came across largely as don’t care.  Here’s an outline of the discussion I had.

The A14 consultation brochuse uses a picture of a bicycle and an old building as one of the chapter heads. This has nothing to do with the contents and is misleading or greenwash.

The A14 consultation brochure uses a picture of a bicycle and an old building as one of the chapter heads. This has nothing to do with the contents and is misleading greenwash.

Pollution

I asked what effect the new road would have on air quality in Cambridge city.

The Highways Agency said they didn’t know. The said they will set up monitoring stations along the route and if necessary mitigation measures will be used. I asked what mitigation measures would be used if air quality was poor, I got no answer.  I asked this three times and they mumbled and fumbled. Eventually one mumbled something about ‘reducing traffic’, which seems odd as their estimates show up to a 20% increase in traffic. They think that a reduction in stop-start driving and an increase in speed from 20mph to 70mph will reduce pollution. They had no information or modelling available to prove this.

I find it astonishing that the detailed engineering has been done and yet the effects of pollution on 150,000 people in Cambridge and area has not been considered. This is despite an estimated 250 people per year (1 in 20) in Cambridgeshire dying early due to air pollution according to the government’s own estimates. This is despite the EU preparing to fine the UK government for failing to meet air quality targets. Just a few weeks ago pollution at Orchard Park School monitoring station (adjacent to the A14 in north Cambridge) reach 10 out of 10, or Very High. Air pollution is a serious and increasing issue in the region but the Highways Agency don’t seem to care.

Traffic in Cambridge

The Highways Agency claim they are working closely with Cambridge City Council.

The Highways Agency claim they are working closely with Cambridge City Council.

I asked where all this extra traffic would go when it reached Cambridge.

The Highways Agency didn’t know. They said they had been working very closely with the City Council (and others) on this.

Tim Ward, Executive Councillor for Planning and Climate Change, was surprised by this and hasn’t had any traffic data despite asking for years. Cllr Ward suggested that there could be 35% more traffic down Huntingdon Road (Cambridge). If true, this astonishing increase would likely bring that road to a halt at peak times.

The City Council, to their credit, are setting aside £1.2 million to mitigate the congestion caused by the A14 works. However with changes to just one junction likely to cost £1m it’s open to question how much this can achieve.

Traffic on the A14

Department of Transport traffic forecasts vs actual. Source: Better Transport

Department of Transport traffic forecasts versus actual. Source: Campaign for Better Transport

The Highways Agency were keen to say that they are ‘adding one more lane in each direction’. This isn’t accurate, they are adding an additional six lanes around Huntingdon. At some points they were claiming the work was to improve safety because of the poor junction designs of the existing roads, at other times it was about long distance travel. They did say that the road will have average speed cameras from end to end. They also said that the new road will be ‘busy’ in the Bar Hill section due to additional building, so it’s not even clear that congestion due to commuters will even be lower after widening. We could spend £1,500 million and end up with the same jams!

At times they said there would not be a 20% increase in traffic and I had to point to their display information to correct them.

I pointed out that the DfT’s traffic forecasting had been incorrect for 20 years, they said the ‘models were better now’.

Knock-on Costs

The existing four-lane road from Fenstaton to Huntingdon will be bypassed by a six lane motorway and the existing road ‘de-trunked’ and passed to Cambridgeshire County Council to maintain. Although there will be some funds passed to the County in compensation, the County will bear the cost of this road. The County is currently almost broke and unable to maintain its roads and fund its schools yet its burden will be increased.

The Highways Agency thought that the growth that the road would bring would offset the costs. It will also bring additional costs and I don’t believe they have any figures to prove their point. Cambridge City Council has not contributed to the cost of the A14 because it will not unlock development within the city. The Highways Agency said the City supported the project, I would say muted support at best.

Cycle Proofing

Prime Minister says 'cycle proof', Highways Agency says 'Did he?'

Prime Minister says ‘cycle proof’, Highways Agency says ‘Did he?’, Cambridge MP says ‘Groan’.

Proposed cycle crossing of A14 at Bar Hill.

Proposed cycle crossing of A14 at Bar Hill.

The Prime Minister said that all future trunk road schemes would be ‘cycle proofed’, though it was unclear what this meant in practice. So I asked what this would mean for this scheme.

The Highways Agency’s first response was ‘Did he?’ Clearly the message isn’t getting through.

The Agency’s approach to cycling can be seen in two parts of this scheme. Firstly the crossing of the A14 at Bar Hill. The snaking, sharply sloped path in the plan (right) is the cycle route. This route is far from the desire lines to Longstanton/Northstowe and to Cambridge.  What would the Dutch do? Probably build an underpass.

If you want to cycle from Bar Hill to Cambridge the proposed route is circuitous but it could be improved by an ≈0.5km section of cycle route connecting the south east edge of the Bar Hill perimeter road to the new local road that is roughly on the line of Oakington Road. Others have suggested this.

The Highways Agency’s response was that they wouldn’t build it because they ‘couldn’t accommodate everyone’. So that’s the usual two fingers to cycling!

Conclusions

The Highways Agency seemed unprepared or unwilling to answer my questions in any depth with any supporting information. Of course they won’t have to live with the consequences.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “‘Don’t know’ – Highways Agency on A14

  1. These incompetent clowns at the Highways Agency are the ones who screwed up the A14 in the first place. There are three major problems with the route: (1) the M1 junction at Catthorpe: by using an existing underbridge of the M1, they could only have 1 lane southbound and two lanes northbound. The jams on the M6 at peak times stretch for 5 miles. There were 17 accidents last on year the two-way Northbound sliproad to the M6 forever an accident waiting to happen. (2) combining the m11/A1(m) traffic with the A14 traffic between Spittals and Girton causes horrendous jams throughout the day, and over 260 accidents in the last five years. The proposed new route alleviates some, not all, of this problem. (3) Putting a motorway volume of traffic on a dual carriageway without a hard shoulder causes lengthy jams when a vehicle breaks down. A lorry with a puncture can hold up traffic for four hours. The verge is soft and unstqable in most places.
    Felixstowe is the major freight port of the UK – all traffic for the north, northeast, northwest, midlands, Wales, Scotland and Ireland travels along the A14. The rail link over the same route has a layout dating back to the 1850s, with all routes radiating from London – traffic from Felixstowe to the Midlands without going via London has only recently (two years ago) been made possible with the construction of the 600m Ipswich Chord. Some of the tunnels and bridges are still unable to carry continental rail traffic gauges.
    I think you have reached your own valuation of the Highways Agency in your review of their forecasting (in)adequacy!

    PS – when the existing stretch of the A14 around Huntingdon is being passed to Cambridgeshire County Council, I hope that they are told about the state of the bridges around Huntingdon, which are in a dangerous state of disrepair.

  2. With the paucity through routes around Cambridge, the A14 situation has a critical impact on the Cambridge road situation. If there is a delay on the A14 between Girton and Stow interchanges, the traffic re-routes via Cambridge. Newmarket Road, Milton Road, Huntingdon Road, Histon Road, Barton Road and Madingley Road will be the main routes affected, together with East Road, Lensfield Road, Queens Road, Northampton Street, Chesterton Road, Fen Causeway. On Newmarket Road the County Council introduced 24 hour 7 day bus lanes, which halved the available carriageway for 95% of the traffic. Parking is permitted on many of these routes – Where it is prohibited, the prohibition is not policed (watch the KFC place on East Road!!!).
    The County Council’s contribution to the traffic problem has been the Pizza Puzzle – dividing the town centre into a pizza with no through routes and forcing all transit traffic onto a pretend ring road.

    Thus the air pollution in Cambridge Town centre – and the traffic chaos in November/December last year.

  3. It would be normal in The Netherlands that when a bypass is built existing routes through the town are closed off to motorised traffic, because a bypass has been built especially to accommodate them. The expectation is that motor traffic has to go out and along the bypass to get to another part of town. The route by motor vehicle is circuitous while that on foot or bike is short and direct; that is what makes many Dutch towns more liveable that UK ones.

    When the A14 clogs up perhaps the police should be stopping motor vehicles from using Cambridge as a rat run? They do have a duty to ensure the highway is not clogged. The traffic should wait on the A14 for it to clear rather than add to the suffering of those in Cambridge.

  4. Agreed,rich257 – the police should take a more active role in traffic management – but you and I both know they don’t and they won’t. Reverting to the original topic, an improved A14 would be more effective as a “Cambridge by-pass” but I fear there will still be delays, even on the improved A14, and peak traffic will still divert through Cambridge’s joke of a “ring road”. Therefore the pollution in Cambridge, which should reduce with the upgraded A14, will probably increase at times when the upgraded A14 can’t cope.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s